(PS) Van Den Heuvel v. Van den Heuvel

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 10, 20242:24-cv-00753California386 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEAN MARC VAN DEN HEUVEL, No. 2:24-cv-00753 DAD CKD (PS) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

AND ORDER

ROBERT VAN DEN HEUVEL, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se and in forma pauperis. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302(c)(21). On April 3, 2024, the undersigned issued an order to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Plaintiff was advised that failure to allege a proper basis for jurisdiction would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Plaintiff has filed a response to the order (ECF No. 6), but it fails to show why this action should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. In light of these recommendations, IT IS ALSO HEREBY ORDERED that all pleading, discovery, and motion practice in this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.