(PC) Whiteman v. Shasta County Jail

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 10, 20242:24-cv-00166California385 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CORRY WHITEMAN, No. 2:24-cv-00166 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS &

RECOMMENDATIONS

SHASTA COUNTY JAIL, Defendant. 16 By order filed April 5, 2024, the first amended complaint was screened and found to not state a claim for relief. ECF No. 12. Plaintiff was given thirty days to file an amended complaint and cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Id. at 6-7. After plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint, he was given an additional twenty- one days to amend the complaint and warned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without further warning. ECF No. 13. Twenty-one days have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall randomly assign a United States District…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.