Ruby

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NICKY BOONE, No. 2:20-cv-02100 WBS DB P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RUBY, et al., Defendants. 16 On April 4, 2024, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff did not timely oppose the motion. By order filed on May 8, 2024, plaintiff was granted an extension of time of 30 additional days from the date of the order to file opposition. Although court records reflect plaintiff was properly served with notice of the motion and the order granting an extension of time to file opposition at plaintiff’s address of record, plaintiff has filed no opposition, Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion....” Further, Local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules “may be grounds for imposition of any and all…