DeVaughn

DeVaughn v. Fresno Police Dept.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 10, 20241:24-cv-00754California2,970 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 STARRIE DeVAUGHN, Case No. 1:24-cv-00754-SKO

Plaintiff, FIRST SCREENING ORDER v. ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO: (1) FILE A FIRST AMENDED

COMPLAINT; OR

FRESNO POLICE DEPARTMENT,

(2) NOTIFY THE COURT THAT SHE Defendant. WISHES TO STAND ON HER

COMPLAINT

15 (Doc. 1)

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

18 19 On June 27, 2024, Plaintiff Starrie DeVaughn (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed an action. (Doc. 1.) On that same date, Plaintiff also filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis, which was granted on June 28, 2024. (Docs. 2 & 3.) Plaintiff’s complaint is now before the Court for screening. Upon review, the Court concludes that the complaint fails to state any cognizable claims. Plaintiff has the following options as to how to proceed. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint, which the Court will screen in due course. Alternatively, Plaintiff may file a statement 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.