Poole

(PS) G.M. v. Poole

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 10, 20242:17-cv-02415California1,030 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 G.M., et al., No. 2:17-cv-2415-TLN-CKD PS Plaintiffs, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ADAM POOLE, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiffs G.M., C.M., and A.M., through their guardian ad litem, Kristina Comphor, are currently proceeding pro se in this action.1 Plaintiffs have failed to prosecute this case. Accordingly, the undersigned recommends it be dismissed without prejudice. I. Background Then represented by counsel, plaintiffs filed this lawsuit on November 15, 2017. (ECF No. 1.) The operative complaint is the second amended complaint, filed on July 9, 2021. (ECF No. 38.) On March 24, 2023, the court granted plaintiffs’ former attorneys’ motion to withdraw as counsel, leaving plaintiffs pro se. (ECF No. 59.) Plaintiffs’ former counsel were directed to serve the order granting the motion on plaintiffs and then file proof of service, including all plaintiffs’ 27 1 Because plaintiffs proceed pro se,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.