(PC) Moore v. Butte County
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAYMOND E. MOORE, Jr., Case No. 2:22-cv-01517-DJC-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER v. DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO PROVIDE
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO EFFECT
BUTTE COUNTY, et al., SERVICE ON DEFENDANT SAGE Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a former pretrial detainee, is proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 8, 2023, I directed the United States Marshal to serve several defendants, including defendant Sage. ECF No. 31. Plaintiff listed defendant Sage’s address at the Well Path in Oroville. Process directed at defendant Sage was returned as unserved because defendant Sage is no longer an employee of Well Path and Well Path has no record of defendant Sage’s current address. ECF No. 41. Accordingly, I ordered plaintiff to promptly seek information for defendant Sage’s address through discovery, the California Public Records Act, Calif. Gov’t. Code § 6250, et seq., or other means…