(PC) Moore v. Butte County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 10, 20242:22-cv-01517California706 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAYMOND E. MOORE, Jr., Case No. 2:22-cv-01517-DJC-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER v. DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO PROVIDE

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO EFFECT

BUTTE COUNTY, et al., SERVICE ON DEFENDANT SAGE Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a former pretrial detainee, is proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 8, 2023, I directed the United States Marshal to serve several defendants, including defendant Sage. ECF No. 31. Plaintiff listed defendant Sage’s address at the Well Path in Oroville. Process directed at defendant Sage was returned as unserved because defendant Sage is no longer an employee of Well Path and Well Path has no record of defendant Sage’s current address. ECF No. 41. Accordingly, I ordered plaintiff to promptly seek information for defendant Sage’s address through discovery, the California Public Records Act, Calif. Gov’t. Code § 6250, et seq., or other means…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.