Oregel

(PC)Marion II v. Oregel

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 7, 20241:24-cv-00872California1,015 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARL BENTLY MARION II, Case No.: 1:24-cv-00872-KES-SKO Plaintiff,

FIRST INFORMATIONAL ORDER IN

v. PRISONER/CIVIL DETAINEE CIVIL

RIGHTS CASE WHERE PLAINTIFF IS

EDGAR OREGEL, et al., PROCEEDING WITH COUNSEL

Defendants. 16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff is a prisoner proceeding with counsel in this civil rights action. In litigating this action, the parties must comply with this Order, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Fed. R. Civ. P) and the Local Rules of the United States District Court, Eastern District of California (Local Rules), as modified by this Order. Failure to comply will be grounds for imposition of sanctions which may include dismissal of the case. Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). II. SCREENING OF COMPLAINT Section 1915A of Title 28 of the United States Code provides as follows: (a) Screening.--The court shall review, before docketing, if feasible or, in any event, as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.