Embry

B&G Foods North America, Inc. v. Embry

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 6, 20242:20-cv-00526California1,324 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 1] B&G Foods North America, Inc., No. 2:20-ev-00526-KIM-DB Plaintiff, ORDER Vv. Kim Embry and Environmental Health Advocates, Inc., acting as enforcement representatives under California Proposition 65 on behalf of the State of California, Defendants.

Plaintiff B&G Foods North America, Inc. applies ex parte for an order amending the case 20 schedule and extending each deadline by six months. For the following reasons, the court grants plaintiffs application. The court incorporates by reference the facts and procedural history of this case from its 23 prior orders. Order (June 1, 2023), ECF No. 82; Order (Jan. 29, 2024), ECF No. 153. Defendants 24 currently have filed a motion to strike and plaintiffs have filed a motion to compel, both of which are unresolved on the docket. See Mot. Strike, ECF No. 181; Mot. Compel, ECF No. 183. The

' Magistrate Judge Barnes retired on July 31,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.