Unknown

(HC) Christensen v. Unknown

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 7, 20242:24-cv-00979California556 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHAD ANDRE CHRISTENSEN, No. 2:24-cv-0979-TLN-DMC Petitioner, v. ORDER UNKNOWN, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules. On May 23, 2024, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Petitioner, and which contained notice that Petitioner may file objections within the time specified therein. (ECF No. 5.) Petitioner filed objections to the findings and recommendations, which the Court considered. (ECF No. 6.) The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.