Doe

Doe v. County of San Joaquin

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 7, 20242:24-cv-00899California2,251 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 JANE DOE, No. 2:24-cv-00899 WBS CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN, SAN

JOAQUIN SHERIFF’S OFFICE,

MICHAEL REYNOLDS (in his individual and official capacities), and PATRICK WITHROW (in his official capacity), 18 Defendants.

20 ----oo0oo---- 21 Plaintiff Jane Doe brings ten federal and state law 22 claims against San Joaquin County; the San Joaquin Sheriff’s 23 Office; Deputy Sheriff Michael Reynolds, in both his personal and 24 official capacity; and Sheriff Patrick Withrow in his official 25 capacity. (First Am. Compl. (“FAC”) (Docket No. 6.) These 26 claims center on allegations of serial sexual assault by 27 Reynolds. Defendants now move for partial dismissal. 28 I. Facts As required on a motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) the court assumes the following allegations to be true and draws all reasonable factual inferences in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.