Poole

(PS) G.M. v. Poole

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 7, 20242:17-cv-02415California292 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 G.M. et al., No. 2:17-cv-02415-TLN-CKD Plaintiffs, v. ORDER ADAM POOLE, et al., Defendants.

16 Plaintiffs G.M., C.M., and A.M., through their guardian ad litem, Kristina Comphor, are currently proceeding pro se in this action. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On July 10, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 64.) The time to file objections has passed, and neither party filed any objections. The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.