Herrera

(PC) Davis v. Herrera

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 7, 20241:24-cv-00896California2,064 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MALIK DAVIS, No. 1:24-cv-00896 GSA (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW

CAUSE WHY THIS MATTER SHOULD NOT

v. BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO

EXHAUST ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES

JASMIN HERRERA, et al.,

PLAINTIFF’S SHOWING OF CAUSE DUE

Defendants. AUGUST 20, 2024 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and has requested authority pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF Nos. 1, 2, 5 (complaint; in forma pauperis application; trust account statement, respectively). The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. For the reasons stated below, Plaintiff will be ordered to show cause why this matter should not be dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. He will be given fourteen days to file the showing of cause. I. PROCEDURAL…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.