Wright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GHAUS MALIK, No. 2:24-cv-00692-TLN-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER ROBERT W. WRIGHT, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding is proceeding in the above captioned action pro se. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On June 17, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties, and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. (ECF No. 19.) Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations which the Court considered. (ECF No. 21.) The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). …