Castro

(PC) Wilson v. Castro

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 7, 20241:24-cv-00542California894 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GERALD JAY WILSON, Case No. 1:24-cv-00542-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

v. TO REMOVE OR TRANSFER CASE J. CASTRO, et al., (Doc. No. 19) Defendants.

16 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s pleading titled “Plaintiff [sic] Motion to Remove or Transfer Plaintiff’s Civil Complaint to Eastern District of Sacramento Jurisdiction As Conflict of Laws in Eastern Jurisdiction of This Court By the Magistrate Assigned by District Judge 28 U.S.C. Section 636(b)(1)(A).” (Doc. No. 17, “Motion”). For the reasons stated below, the Court grants in part and denies in part the motion. On May 9, 2024, the Court struck Plaintiff’s Complaint because it failed to comply with Rule 8 of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure and directed Plaintiff to file an amended complaint no later than June 10, 2024. (See Doc. No. 16). In response, Plaintiff filed a Motion for 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.