Fite

Fite v. Sysco Sacramento, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 8, 20242:21-cv-01633California1,392 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Stan S. Mallison (SBN 184191) StanM@TheMMLawFirm.com Hector R. Martinez (SBN 206336) HectorM@TheMMLawFirm.com Daniel C. Keller (SBN 332576) Dkeller@TheMMLawFirm.com Caroline L. Hill (SBN 349176) CHill@themmlawfirm.com MALLISON & MARTINEZ 1939 Harrison Street, Suite 730 Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: (510) 832-9999 Facsimile: (510) 832-1101

Attorneys for Plaintiff GLENN FITE

[Additional Counsel Listed On Following Page]

10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 GLENN FITE and DAVID GARCIA, Case No. 2:21-CV-01633-DJC-AC individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, JOINT STIPULATION FOR AN ORDER TO STAY MATTER PENDING Plaintiffs, COMPLETION OF MEDIATION SCHEDULED FOR OCTOBER 30, 2024; vs. ORDER 17 SYSCO SACRAMENTO, INC., a Delaware Complaint Filed: September 10, 2021 Corporation; and DOES 1-50, inclusive, Trial Date: None Set

Defendants. Before the Honorable Daniel J. Calabretta…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.