(PC) Perry v. Sacramento County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 7, 20242:24-cv-00883California519 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID PERRY, No. 2:24-CV-0883-DJC-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SACRAMENTO COUNTY, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief. See ECF No. 5. The legal principles applicable to requests for injunctive relief, such as a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction, are well established. To prevail, the moving party must show that irreparable injury is likely in the absence of an injunction. See Stormans, Inc. v. Selecky, 586 F.3d 1109, 1127 (9th Cir. 2009) (citing Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc., 129 S.Ct. 365 (2008)). To prevail on a motion for injunctive relief, "there must be a relationship between the injury claimed in the motion for injunctive relief and the conduct asserted in the underlying…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.