Sierra Northern Railway v. Port of West Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 7, 20242:24-cv-01899California6,821 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SIERRA NORTHERN RAILWAY, No. 2:24-cv-01899-DJC-JDP Plaintiff, v. ORDER ISSUING PRELIMINARY

INJUNCTION

PORT OF WEST SACRAMENTO and

RAMCON ENGINEERING &

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING,

INC.,

16 Defendants. 17 Following the issuance of a Temporary Restraining Order, the Court now considers Plaintiff’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction pending resolution of this case. Plaintiff has provided sufficient evidence to show entitlement to a preliminary injunction under the “serious questions” test. As discussed below, there is a significant factual dispute between the Parties that may determine the outcome of Plaintiff’s claims. If Plaintiff is ultimately able to establish the facts in its favor, then Plaintiff is likely to succeed on the merits. Considering the allegations in the Complaint and the facts in the record, the Court concludes that Plaintiff has established at least serious questions about the merits of its claims. Without issuance 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.