Hulet

Hulet v. County of Tuolumne

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 8, 20241:23-cv-01217California2,400 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRESNO DIVISION

11 GRANT HULET, Case No. 1:23-cv-01217-KES-HBK

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED

PROTECTIVE ORDER

vs. RE: PERSONNEL FILES

COUNTY OF TUOLUMNE, TUOLUMNE

COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, BILL POOLEY, (Doc. No. 40) CARL BENSON, MARCUS GREEN,

SHAYLENE GRAZIOSE, JESSICA HOLT,

SHELBY HEDGPETH, and DANIEL GAVRILAS,

Defendants.

STIPULATION

A. PURPOSE AND LIMITATION

21 Defendants believe that the disclosure and discovery activity concerning the materials described 22 in this stipulated protective order is likely to involve production of information for which protection from 23 public disclosure would be warranted. Plaintiff has not been permitted to view the materials described in 24 this stipulated protective order. The parties acknowledge that this protective order does not confer 25 blanket protections on all disclosures or discovery activity, and that the protection it affords extends only 26 to the limited information or items that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.