Coleman

(UD)(PS) Fang v. Coleman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 8, 20242:24-cv-02119California1,210 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FANG, et al., No. 2:24-cv-02119-DAD-JDP (PS) Plaintiffs, v. ORDER SUA SPONTE REMANDING CASE

TO SACRAMENTO COUNTY SUPERIOR

JACQUELINE COLEMAN, COURT AND DENYING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AS MOOT

Defendant. (Doc. No. 2)

17 This is an unlawful detainer action brought under California state law by plaintiffs Xiaoyan Fang and Ye Fang. On August 6, 2023, defendant, proceeding pro se, removed this case to this federal court from the Sacramento County Superior Court. (Doc. No. 1.) According to defendant, removal is proper because this action purportedly arises under federal law. (Id. at 2.) Also on August 6, 2024, defendant filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. No. 2.) A district court has “a duty to establish subject matter jurisdiction over the removed action sua sponte, whether the parties raised the issue or not.” United Investors Life Ins. Co. v. Waddell & Reed, Inc., 360…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.