Coleman
(UD)(PS) Fang v. Coleman
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FANG, et al., No. 2:24-cv-02119-DAD-JDP (PS) Plaintiffs, v. ORDER SUA SPONTE REMANDING CASE
TO SACRAMENTO COUNTY SUPERIOR
JACQUELINE COLEMAN, COURT AND DENYING MOTION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AS MOOT
Defendant. (Doc. No. 2)
17 This is an unlawful detainer action brought under California state law by plaintiffs Xiaoyan Fang and Ye Fang. On August 6, 2023, defendant, proceeding pro se, removed this case to this federal court from the Sacramento County Superior Court. (Doc. No. 1.) According to defendant, removal is proper because this action purportedly arises under federal law. (Id. at 2.) Also on August 6, 2024, defendant filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. No. 2.) A district court has “a duty to establish subject matter jurisdiction over the removed action sua sponte, whether the parties raised the issue or not.” United Investors Life Ins. Co. v. Waddell & Reed, Inc., 360…