Amps

Amps v. Harrell

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 9, 20241:23-cv-01259California902 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TRAVARIS AMPS, Case No. 1:23-cv-1259-KES-SKO Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS

v. ACTION, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, FOR

FAILURE TO OBEY COURT ORDER AND

ALVIN HARRELL, FAILURE TO PROSECUTE Defendant. Doc. 5 16 Plaintiff Travaris Amps proceeds pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Plaintiff initiated this action by filing a complaint on August 22, 2023. Doc. 1. However, plaintiff did not pay the court’s filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. See Docket. On August 24, 2023, the court ordered plaintiff to apply to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee. Doc. 2. After plaintiff failed to do so, on October 2, 2023, the assigned magistrate judge issued an order for plaintiff to show cause within…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.