(PC) Cone v. Gamble III

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 8, 20241:24-cv-00799California543 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CHRIS MONROE CONE, Case No. 1:24-cv-00799-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

v. (ECF No. 11) GAMBLE III, et al., Defendants. 12 Plaintiff Chris Monroe Cone (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The complaint has not yet been screened. (ECF No. 1.) On August 7, 2024, Plaintiff filed a notice of change of address, which included a note stating: “SATF Mental Health Doctor Ms. Thorpe request I ask for Help via private lawyer provided by Court Due to current physical/mental health disabilities.” (ECF No. 11.) The Court construes Plaintiff’s note as a renewed request for appointment of counsel. Plaintiff is reminded that he does not have a constitutional right to appointed counsel in this action, Rand v. Rowland, 113 F.3d 1520, 1525 (9th Cir. 1997), rev’d in part on other grounds, 154 F.3d 952, 954 n.1 (9th Cir. 1998), and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.