Darby

(PS) Burton v. Darby

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 9, 20242:23-cv-03034California5,089 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STANLEY BURTON, No. 2:23-cv-03034 KJM AC (PS) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS LAILA DARBY, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding in this matter pro se, and pre-trial proceedings are accordingly referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). Plaintiff is suing the Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency (“SHRA”), Laila Darby (SHRA director) and Ibra Henley (SHRA Hearing Coordinator) for violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. ECF No. 1 at 3-4. Defendant SHRA moved to dismiss. ECF No. 13. Plaintiff filed an opposition (ECF No. 14) and a supplemental opposition (ECF No. 16). Defendant SHRA filed a reply. ECF No. 18. Plaintiff filed an unauthorized surreply. ECF No. 19. A hearing was set for June 6, 2024, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 26. ECF No. 13. Counsel Graham Matthew Cridland appeared on behalf of defendant SHRA, but plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.