Ayodale

Smith v. Ayodale

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 8, 20241:24-cv-00538California513 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CANDACE SMITH, ) Case No.: 1: 24-cv-0538 JLT BAM ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND ) RECOMMENDATIONS IN PART, DISMISSING v. ) THE ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AND ) DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE MERCY AYODALE, et al., ) THE CASE ) Defendants. ) (Doc. 11) ) )

Candace Smith alleges the defendants are “special agents from the country of Nigeria” are are liable to her for violations of federal and state criminal acts. (See Doc. 9 at 1, 3-5.) The magistrate judge screened Plaintiff’s amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), and found Plaintiff failed to allege facts sufficient to support a conclusion that the Court has jurisdiction over her claims. (Doc. 11 at 3-6.) The magistrate judge found that “Plaintiff’s allegations rise to the level of the irrational or wholly incredible.” (Id. at 6.) The magistrate judge determined the amended complaint “is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.