(PS) Brown v. Roseville City School District
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID BROWN, No. 2:23-cv-02256 DJC CKD (PS) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ROSEVILLE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 In this civil rights action, plaintiff, proceeding pro se, claims that defendants violated his First Amendment rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the court is defendants’ motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 18, “FAC”) which is fully briefed. ECF Nos. 19, 20 & 22. On August 7, 2024, the undersigned held a hearing on the motion, with plaintiff appearing pro se and Ryan Ichinaga appearing for defendants. ECF No. 23. For the reasons explained below, the undersigned will recommend that the FAC be dismissed with prejudice. A. The First Amended Complaint Plaintiff commenced this action and paid the filing fee on October 5, 2023. ECF No. 1. The gravamen of the complaint was that plaintiff’s First Amendment rights were violated when Roseville middle school…