Pfieffer
(PC) Stone v. Pfieffer
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ADAM JAY STONE, No. 1:21-cv-01461-KES-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
TO COMPEL, DENYING SUPPLEMENTAL
v. MOTION TO COMPEL, AND DENYING
MOTION TO EXTEND DISCOVERY
C. PFEIFFER, et al., DEADLINE AS MOOT Defendants. (ECF Nos. 158, 159, 161) 16 Plaintiff Adam Jay Stone is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to compel, motion to stay and extend the discovery deadline, and supplemental motion to compel, filed June 24, 2024 and July 8, 2024, respectively. (ECF Nos. 158, 159, 161.) I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND This action is proceeding Plaintiff’s excessive force claim against Defendants B. Gonzales, G. Morales, K. Gonzales, and Anderson in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Defendants filed an answer to the complaint on…