(PC) Duncan v. California Healthcare Receivership Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 9, 20241:20-cv-01288California2,620 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DIONTAE JOHAN DUNCAN, Case No. 1:20-cv-01288-KES-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO GRANT DEFENDANT TAYLOR’S

v. MOTION TO DISMISS

CALIFORNIA HEALTHCARE (Doc. 101) RECEIVERSHIP CORP., et al., 14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Diontae Johan Duncan is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. INTRODUCTION On June 1, 2023, then assigned District Judge Ana de Alba issued an Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations to Dismiss Certain Claims and Defendants from Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint. (Doc. 80.) The action was ordered to “proceed only on the Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to serious medical needs claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendants Marciel, Graywall, Taylor, Gerderal, and Jane Does #1 and #2 (Claim I) in Plaintiff’s second amended complaint,”…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.