(HC)Brundidge

(HC)Brundidge v. Trate

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 13, 20241:24-cv-00245California1,029 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARSENIO C. BRUNDIDGE, ) Case No.: 1:24-cv-0245 JLT HBK (HC) ) Petitioner, ) ORDER ADOPTING THE FINDINGS AND ) RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING FIRST v. ) AMENDED PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS ) CORPUS, AND DIRECTING CLERK OF B.M. TRATE, Warden, ) COURT TO CLOSE CASE ) Respondent. ) (Docs. 8, 9) ) )

Arsenio C. Brundidge, a federal prisoner, proceeds pro se with a first amended petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, asserting he is actually innocent, and he suffered “ineffective assistance of counsel/Sixth Amendment violations.” (Doc. 8 at 2-3, 6.) The assigned magistrate judge conducted a preliminary review and found the Court lacks jurisdiction. (Doc. 9 at 2-4.) The magistrate judge observed that Petitioner’s conviction and sentence were affirmed on direct appeal by the Eleventh Circuit. (Doc. 9 at 2, citing United States v. Brundidge, 708 Fed. App’x 608…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.