(PC)Baker

(PC)Baker v. Lozano

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 13, 20241:24-cv-00716California1,068 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MILLARD WAYNE BAKER, JR., No. 1:24-cv-00716 GSA (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

v.

ORDER RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF

LOZANO, et al., MATTER FOR FAILURE TO OBEY COURT

ORDERS

Defendants. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); L.R. 110

PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS DUE AUGUST

28, 2024 18 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. For the reasons stated below the undersigned will recommend that this matter be dismissed for failure to obey a court order. Plaintiff will be given fourteen days to file objections. I. RELEVANT FACTS On June 20, 2024, Plaintiff’s complaint and an application to proceed in forma pauperis were docketed. ECF Nos. 1, 2. The next day, after…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.