BMO Bank N.A. v. Royal Road Line Inc

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BMO BANK N.A., Case No. 1:23-cv-01714 JLT EPG Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND GRANTING IN

v. PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

DEFAULT JUDGMENT

ROYAL ROAD LINE INC, et al., (Docs. 11, 17) 15 Defendants. 16 BMO Harris Bank N.A. seeks to hold Royal Road Line, Inc. and Nishan Singh, the owner of Royal Road Line, liable for breach of contract. (See generally Doc. 1.) After Defendants failed to answer, the Court entered default against Defendants. (Doc. 9.) Plaintiff now seeks default judgment against Defendants. (Doc. 11.) The magistrate judge found the Court has jurisdiction over the claims presented and personal jurisdiction over Defendants. (Doc. 17 at 4-6.) The magistrate judge also determined Plaintiff complied with the service requirements under Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Id. at 7-8.) Examining the sufficiency of the complaint, the magistrate judge found “Plaintiff has…