Luna
(PC) Dismuke v. Luna
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
I. BACKGROUND
22 Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action on February 28, 2024. (ECF No. 23 1). Plaintiff alleged that various officers failed to protect him from assault by other inmates. 24 (See generally ECF No. 1). The Court has screened the complaint and on June 25, 2024, issued 25 a screening order holding that Plaintiff failed to state any cognizable claims. (ECF No. 9). The 26 Court gave Plaintiff 30 days to either file an amended complaint or file a statement with the 27 Court that he wants to stand on his original complaint. (Id. at 6–7). The Court advised Plaintiff 28 that, if he chooses to stand on the filed complaint, the Court would issue “findings and recommendations to a district judge recommending dismissal of the action” consistent with the Court’s screening order. (Id. at 2–3). Finally, the Court has warned the Plaintiff that “Failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this action.” (Id. at 7; see also ECF No. 3 at 1 (warning Plaintiff that failure to follow the Court’s orders and all applicable rules “will be grounds for imposition of sanctions which may include dismissal of the case.”)). The…