Howard
(PC) Walker v. Howard
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARQUISE WALKER, Case No.: 1:22-cv-00332-JLT-CDB Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING
WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE
v. DISMISSED FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE
TO COMPLY WITH THE LOCAL RULES
HOWARD, et al., 14-DAY DEADLINE Defendant.
17 Plaintiff Marquise Walker is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 15, 2024, Defendant Howard filed a partial motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint. (Doc. 23.) Specifically, the motion seeks to dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amendment retaliation claim pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Id. at 5-10.) Defendant’s motion included the following notice: “Written opposition to this motion must be filed not more than 21 days after the date of service of the motion, plus three days, if service is by mail,” quoting Local Rule 230(l). (Id. at 2.) The Local Rules, corresponding with Federal…