BASF Corporation v. Color Coat Restoration, Inc

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BASF CORPORATION, Case No. 1:24-cv-00614-JLT-CDB

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED

v.

FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO

PROSECUTE THIS ACTION AND TO

COLOR COAT RESTORATION, INC., et al.,

COMPLY WITH THE COURT’S ORDERS

Defendants.

ORDER CONTINUING THE

MANDATORY SCHEDULING

CONFERENCE

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

EFFECT SERVICE OF THIS ORDER AND

TO FILE PROOF OF SERVICE

FIVE-DAY DEADLINE

20 21 Plaintiff BASF Corporation (“Plaintiff”) initiated this action with the filing of a complaint on May 22, 2024. (Doc. 1). That same day, the Clerk of the Court issued summonses and the Court entered an order setting a mandatory scheduling conference on August 20, 2024. (Docs. 4-5). The Court’s order directed Plaintiff to “diligently pursue service of summons and complaint” and “promptly file proofs of service.” (Doc. 5 at 1). The order further advised Plaintiff that failure to diligently prosecute this action “may result in the imposition of…