Ho

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES EDWARD TAYLOR, JR., No. 2:23-cv-0005 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

HO, et al., Defendants. 16 On May 23, 2024, defendant filed two motions to compel and a motion for judgment on the pleadings. ECF Nos. 33-35. On June 4, 2024, defendant filed a third motion to compel. ECF No. 36. After plaintiff failed to respond to any of the motions, he was ordered to do so within twenty-one days and cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). ECF No. 41. The twenty-one-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed a response to any of the motions or otherwise responded to the court’s order. In recommending this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute, the court has considered “(1) the public’s interest in expeditious resolution of litigation;…