DeVaughn
DeVaughn v. Fresno Police Dept.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
STARRIE DeVAUGHN, Case No. 1:24-cv-00754-SKO
Plaintiff,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE
v. ACTION SHOULD NOT BE
RECOMMENDED FOR DISMISSAL
12 FRESNO POLICE DEPARTMENT, (Doc. 4) 13 Defendant. TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE _____________________________________/
15 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed the complaint in this action on June 27, 2024. (Docs. 1, 2, & 3.) On July 10, 2024, the Court issued an order finding that Plaintiff’s complaint failed to state any cognizable claims and granting leave for Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within thirty days. (Doc. 4.) To date, Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or requested an extension of time within which to do so. The Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, corresponding with Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, provide, “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with . . . any order of the Court may be grounds…