(PC) McClinton v. St. Andre

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 14, 20242:23-cv-00379California291 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDRE KAEFUNN MCCLINTON, No. 2:23-cv-0379 DJC DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER ROBERT ST. ANDRE, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 13, 2024, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Having considered the factors described in Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir. 1992) the Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.