Shirley
(PC) Jackson v. Shirley
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 AARON JACKSON, Case No. 1:23-cv-00509-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE
AND v. ORDER REQUIRING STATEMENTS
FROM PARTIES REGARDING
SCHEDULE AND DISCOVERY
HEATHER SHIRLEY, et al., THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE Defendants. 16 The Court has screened Plaintiff’s complaint (ECF No. 11) and has ordered the case to proceed on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment conditions of confinement claims against Defendants Shirley, Degough, and Cronjager (ECF No. 12). Defendants have appeared and filed an Answer. (ECF No. 22). In addition, “[a]fter investigating the claims and speaking with Plaintiff,” 20 Defendants filed a notice (ECF No. 21) that they “do not believe that a settlement conference 21 would be productive at this time.” Accordingly, the Court will not set a settlement conference at 22 this time and will proceed to issuing a scheduling order in this case. However,…