Shirley

(PC) Jackson v. Shirley

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 14, 20241:23-cv-00509California717 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 AARON JACKSON, Case No. 1:23-cv-00509-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE

AND v. ORDER REQUIRING STATEMENTS

FROM PARTIES REGARDING

SCHEDULE AND DISCOVERY

HEATHER SHIRLEY, et al., THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE Defendants. 16 The Court has screened Plaintiff’s complaint (ECF No. 11) and has ordered the case to proceed on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment conditions of confinement claims against Defendants Shirley, Degough, and Cronjager (ECF No. 12). Defendants have appeared and filed an Answer. (ECF No. 22). In addition, “[a]fter investigating the claims and speaking with Plaintiff,” 20 Defendants filed a notice (ECF No. 21) that they “do not believe that a settlement conference 21 would be productive at this time.” Accordingly, the Court will not set a settlement conference at 22 this time and will proceed to issuing a scheduling order in this case. However,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.