(PS) Peterson v. County of Sacramento Sheriff's Dept.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 15, 20242:18-cv-00836California811 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DESIREE PETERSON, Case No. 2:18-cv-00836-KJM-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, ORDER v. DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO E-

FILE AND DENYING HER MOTION FOR

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO AN EXTENSION OF TIME AND WAIVE SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, et al., COPYING FEES 15 Defendants. ECF Nos. 21 & 23

17 18 Plaintiff, proceeding in forma pauperis and without counsel, filed this civil rights action against various Sacramento County Departments and employees. Plaintiff has filed a motion to e- file, ECF No. 21, and a motion for an automatic extension of time and a waiver of costs for copies, ECF No. 23. For the following reasons, I will deny both. Motion to E-File Plaintiff requests permission to electronically file documents through the court’s electronic case management system. ECF No. 21. She notes that she has read the local rules concerning e-filing and that her PACER account is active. Id. Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.