(SS) Alarcon v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 15, 20241:23-cv-00851California6,353 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE RAUL ALARCON, Case No. 1:23-cv-00851-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, GRANTING

v. DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT, AND AFFIRMING THE

MARTIN O’MALLEY, DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER OF

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SOCIAL SECURITY2

SECURITY,1 (Doc. Nos. 16, 20) Defendant. 17 18 Jose Raul Alarcon (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying his application for supplemental security income under the Social Security Act. (Doc. No. 1). The matter is currently before the undersigned on the parties’ briefs, which were submitted without oral argument. (Doc. Nos. 16, 20). For the reasons stated, the Court denies Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, grants Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and affirms the

1 This action was originally filed against…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.