McKesson

(PC) Borhan v. McKesson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 14, 20241:21-cv-00218California1,056 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 PAYMAN BORHAN, No. 1:21-cv-00218-KES-GSA (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

v. Doc. 12 J. MCKESSON, Defendant. 14 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Plaintiff filed the complaint in February 2021. Doc. 1. On May 2, 2024, the court screened the matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). Doc. 10. In the screening order, the court found that the complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted and instructed plaintiff to file an amended complaint within thirty days. Id. at 11. It warned plaintiff that failure to file an amended complaint within such thirty days would result in a recommendation that the matter be dismissed. Id. On May 13, 2024, the screening order was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.