(SS) Riddle v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 15, 20241:23-cv-00865California2,728 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JENNIFER MARY RIDDLE, Case No. 1:23-cv-00865-KJM-JDP (SS) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT BE GRANTED

MARTIN O’MALLEY, Commissioner of AND THE COMMISSIONER’S CROSS- Social Security MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BE DENIED Defendant. ECF Nos. 13 & 16 OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

18 Plaintiff, who suffers from carpal and cubital tunnel syndrome, obesity, and varicose veins, challenges the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying her applications for a period of disability, disability insurance benefits (“DIB”), and supplemental security income (“SSI”) under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act. Both parties have moved for summary judgment. ECF Nos. 13 & 16. For the reasons discussed below, I recommend that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.