Gipson

(HC) Johnson v. Gipson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 15, 20242:21-cv-00971California914 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS MAURICE JOHNSON, No. 2:21-cv-00971 KJM AC P Petitioner, v. ORDER CONNIE GIPSON, Warden, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a former California state prisoner proceeding pro se,1 has filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 18, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on all parties, and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Petitioner has filed

1 Although petitioner is no longer in custody, his release does not moot his request for habeas relief because he challenges his underlying conviction. See Pet. at 61, ECF No. 1 25 (requesting the reversal of judgment); see also Wilson v. Terhune, 319 F.3d 477, 479 (9th Cir. 2003)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.