(PS) Smith v. Daybreak Metro Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 COURTNEY SMITH, No. 2:24-cv-0124-TLN-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER DAYBREAK METRO INC., et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff filed the above captioned civil action without counsel. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On June 21, 2024, and July 16, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF Nos. 16, 18.) The time to file objections has passed, and Plaintiff has not filed any objections. The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the…