Powell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL HARPER, No. 2:24-cv-1343-TLN-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER B. POWELL, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 18), which the Court construes as a Motion to Reconsider the Court’s June 21, 2024 Order denying his Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 17). “A motion for reconsideration should not be granted, absent highly unusual circumstances, unless the district court is presented with newly discovered evidence, committed clear error, or if there is an intervening change in the controlling law.” Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. v. Mucos Pharma GmbH & Co., 571 F.3d 873, 880 (9th Cir. 2009) (internal citations and quotations omitted). Further, local Rule 230(j) requires that a motion for reconsideration state “what new or different facts or circumstances are claimed to exist which did not exist or were not shown upon such prior…