Coleman

(PC) Foster v. Coleman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 16, 20241:24-cv-00813California1,556 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JONAS B. FOSTER, Case No. 1:24-cv-00813-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE TO

v. ACTION RICHARD COLEMAN, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION

Defendant. (Doc. 9)

FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE

17 Plaintiff Jonas B. Foster (“Plaintiff”), a jail inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, initiated this civil action on July 15, 2024. (Doc. 1.) On August 5, 2024, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and granted him leave to amend to establish this Court’s jurisdiction. (Doc. 8.) Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, filed on August 15, 2024, is currently before the Court for screening. (Doc. 9.) I. Screening Requirement and Standard The Court screens complaints brought by persons proceeding in pro se and in forma pauperis. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Plaintiff’s complaint, or any portion thereof, is subject to 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.