Chavez

(PC) Haygood v. Chavez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 14, 20241:24-cv-00239California649 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 HASSAUN HAYGOOD, 1:24-cv-000239-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING

WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE

v. DISMISSED FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE

TO COMPLY WITH THE LOCAL RULES

DANNY CHAVEZ, 14-DAY DEADLINE Defendant.

15 Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s First Amendment free exercise of religion claim against Defendant Chavez. On July 16, 2024, Defendant Chavez filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint. (Doc. 14.) Defendant’s motion included the following notice: “Written opposition to this motion must be filed not more than 21 days after the date of service of the motion, plus three days, if service is by mail,” quoting Local Rule 230(l). (Id. at 2.) The Local Rules, corresponding with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, provide, “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.