(PC) Rood v. Department of Corrections
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 COLTON JAMES ROOD, Case No. 1:19-cv-01517-JLT-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
GRANT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
v.
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD
N. KEOVILAY-SEE and SCOTT FRAUENHEIM, (Doc. No. 90) 16 Defendants. 17 18 Pending before the Court is Defendants N. Keovilay-See and Scott Frauenheim’s motion for summary judgment filed April 8, 2024. (Doc. No. 90, “MSJ”). Plaintiff did not file any opposition. (See docket). For the reasons discussed below, the undersigned recommends the district court grant Defendants’ Motion because there is no genuine dispute of material facts as to whether Defendant Keovilay-See failed to protect Plaintiff from a serious threat to his safety in violation of the Eighth Amendment and whether Defendant Frauenheim failed to train his subordinates in violation of Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment right. I. BACKGROUND A. Procedural History …