Bandaru

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES CARL KELLY, Case No. 2:24-cv-01161-DJC-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. THAT THE CLERK OF COURT BE

DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS MATTER

BANDARU, et al.,

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

Defendants. DAYS 16 Plaintiff is a “Three-Striker” within the meaning of Title 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Kelly v. Sao, No. 1:19-cv-00681-LJO-BAM (E.D. Cal. May 19, 2019) (recognizing plaintiff as a “three- striker” within in the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)). Accordingly, on April 30, 2024, I recommended that plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied. ECF No. 7. Plaintiff was allowed fourteen days to file objections. Id. at 3. I also recommended that plaintiff be directed to tender the filing fee within thirty days of any order adopting these recommendations. Id. Plaintiff did not file objections or tender the filing fee. On June 27, 2024, the district judge adopted the findings and…