Bonta

(HC) Deary-Smith v. Bonta

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 19, 20242:20-cv-00572California356 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RASHID DESHAWN DEARY-SMITH, No. 2:20-cv-00572 KJM AC Petitioner, v. ORDER STUART SHERMAN, et al., Respondents. 16 Petitioner, a former state prisoner proceeding through retained counsel, filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 2, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 48. Petitioner has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.