Kersh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JARVON D. GREEN, Case No. 2:22-cv-01053-TLN-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER v. GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO COMPEL

R. KERSH, et al., ECF No. 52 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brought this action alleging that defendant Kersh violated his Eighth Amendment rights by using excessive force against him, and that defendant Alkire violated his due process rights. ECF No. 12. Now pending is plaintiff’s motion to compel, ECF No. 52, to which defendants have filed an opposition, ECF No. 55. For the reasons stated below, plaintiff’s motion to compel is granted in part. I. Legal Standard Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 34 “[t]he party to whom [a request for production] is directed must respond in writing within 30 days after being served.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 34(b)(2)(A). The responding party may state an objection to any request, but must offer a specific rationale for…