Neuschmid

(HC) Bruno v. Neuschmid

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 20, 20242:19-cv-00934California593 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALEX BRUNO, No. 2:19-cv-00934-DAD-AC (HC) Petitioner, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING

R. NEUSCHMID, FEDERAL HABEAS PETITION Respondent. (Doc. No. 21) 16 Petitioner Alex Bruno is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 29, 2024, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that the pending petition for federal habeas relief (Doc. No. 1) be denied on the merits. (Doc. No. 21.) Those findings and recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within twenty-one (21) days from the date of service. (Id. at 14–15.) To date, no objections have been filed and the time in which to do…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.